RESUMO
The proceedings contain 109 papers. The topics discussed include: dose intensity of palbociclib and initial body weight dosage: implications on progression free survival in 220 patients with ER+/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer;characteristics of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir (Paxlovid) recipients and clinical interventions by oncology pharmacists at a tertiary outpatient cancer center;safe handling of non-carcinogenic drugs in the Ghent University Hospital: development, implementation and communication of hospital-specific guidelines;case series: use of olaparib in uncommon locations in patients with impaired homologous recombination;real-world data evaluation of medicines used in special situations in oncohematology: a retrospective study from a comprehensive cancer institution;Dostarlimab in the treatment of recurrent endometrial cancer: real life experience;medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws and CDK4/6 inhibitors in breast cancer;and efficacy and safety outcomes of generic imatinib in adults with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) following the switch from branded imatinib.
RESUMO
Introduction: Croatian National Cancer Registry of Croatian Institute for Public Health reported that in year 2020 lung cancer was the second most common cancer site diagnosed in men with 16% and the third most common in women with 10% incidence among all cancer sites. Unfortunatelly lung cancer has the highest mortality in both men and women. Haematological malignancies had 7% share in all malignancies in both male and female cances cases. In 2020 190 newly diagnosed cases of lymphatic leukemia in men and 128 cases in women were reporeted, meaning 1.5 and 1.2% of all malignancies, respectively. Chronic lymphatic leukemia (CLL) is an advanced age disease and incidence increases with age. Impaired immunity, T and B cell dysfunction in CLL, chromosomal aberations, long-term immunosuppressive therapy and genetic factors can all cause secondary malignancies. Co- occurence of solid tumors and CLL is very rare. Although patiens with CLL have an increased risk of developing second primary malignancies including lung carcinoma, the data about their clinical outcomes are lacking. Parekh et al. retrospectively analyzed patients with simultaneous CLL and lung carcinoma over a 20-year period, and they found that ~2% of patients with CLL actually developed lung carcinoma. The authors claimed that up to 38% of patients will also develop a third neoplasm more likely of the skin (melanoma and basal cell carcinoma), larynx (laryngeal carcinoma) or colon. Currently there are no specific guidelines for concurrent CLL and non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) treatment. Usually, when the tumors are diagnosed simultaneously, treatment is based to target the most aggressive malignancy, as the clinical outcomes depend on the response of the tumor with the poorest prognosis. For this reason, a multidisciplinary approach is mandatory. Case report: A patient with history of coronary heart disease, myocardial infarction and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation was diagnosed in 2019 (at the age of 71) with B chronic lymphocytic leukemia with bulky tumor (inguinal lymph nodes 8x5 cm), stage B according to Binet, intermediate risk. He was treated with 6 cycles of chemoimmunotherapy (rituximab/cyclofosfamid/fludarabine). In 10/2019 remission was confirmed, but MSCT described tumor in the posterior segment of upper right lung lobe measuring 20x17 mm and bilateral metastases up to 11 mm. Bronchoscopy and biopsy were performed, and EGFR neg, ALK neg, ROS 1 neg, PD-L1>50% adenocarcinoma was confirmed. He was referred to Clinical Hospital Center Osijek where monotherapy with pembrolizumab in a standard dose of 200 mg intravenously was started in 01/2020. Partial remission was confirmed in October 2020. Immunotherapy was discontinued due to development of pneumonitis, dysphagia and severe weight loss (20kg), but without radiologically confirmed disease progression. At that time he was referred to our hospital for further treatment. Gastroscopy has shown erosive gastritis with active duodenal ulcus, Forrest III. Supportive therapy and proton pump inhibitor were introduced. After complete regression of pneumonitis, improvement of general condition and resolution of dysphagia, no signs of lung cancer progression were found and pembrolizumab was reintroduced in 12/2021. Hypothyroidism was diagnosed in 01/2021 and levothyroxine replacement ther apy was started. In 03/2021 he underwent surgical removal of basal cell carcinoma of skin on the right temporal region with lobe reconstruction. From 02/2021, when pembrolizumab was reintroduced, regression in tumor size was continously confirmed with complete recovery of general condition. He was hospitalized for COVID 19 infection in 09/2021, and due to complications pembrolizumab was discontinued till 11/2021. Lung cancer immunotherapy proceeded till 11/2022, when Multidisciplinary team decided to finish pembrolizumab because of CLL relapse. CLL was in remission till August 2022 when due to B symptoms, lymphcytosis, anemia and generalized lymphadenopathy, hematological workup including biopsy of cervical lymph node was performed and CLL/SLL relapse was confirmed. Initially chlorambucil was introduced, but disease was refractory. Based on cytogenetic test results (IGHV unmutated, negative TP53) and due to cardiovascular comorbidity (contraindication for BTK inhibitors) venetoclax and rituximab were started in 01/2023. After just 1 cycle of treatment normal blood count as well as regression of B symptoms and peripheral lymphadenopathy occured, indicating the probability of complete disease remission. In our patient with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma excellent disease control is achieved during 41 month of treatment in first line setting. Furthermore, relapsed/refractory CLL/SLL is currently in confirmed remission. Conclusion(s): Successful treatment of patients with multiple primary malignancies is based on multidisciplinarity, early recognition and management of side effects, treatment of comorbidities with the aim of prolonging life, controlling symptoms of disease and preserving quality of life.
RESUMO
Project objective: Despite the recent revolution in immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), only modest improvement in overall survival and likely caused by not enough potent cellular immunity among BC patients. Our lab has been focus on inducing cellular immunity against HER2+ BC through vaccination against the tumor-associated antigen HER2. Approximately 20 years ago, we performed an experimental pilot study by administrating HER2 peptide and recombinant protein pulsed dendritic cells (DC vaccine) to six patients with refractory HER2+ advanced or metastatic (stage II (>= 6 +LN), III, or stage IV) BC. We followed the patients on 2019 found that all of the six patients were still alive, 18 years after vaccination. Their blood sample were analyzed with cytometry by time-offlight (CyTOF) and found there is a significantly increased presence of CD27 expressing memory T cells in response to HER2 peptide stimulation. Recent report on the SARS-CoV2 mRNA vaccine also suggested that CD27 expressing memory T cells plays a critical role in long-lasting cellular immunity against SARS-CoV2 infection. Therefore, we hypothesized that CD27 plays a critical role in cellular immunity against BC, and the stimulation of CD27 expressing T cells with mAb targeting CD27 significantly increase the cellular immunity triggered by vaccination against tumor-associated antigen. Result(s): We recapitulate the rise of CD27+ antigen specific T cells among the vaccinated patients using a transgenic mouse model expressing human CD27. When combined the adenoviral-vector based HER2 (Ad-HER2) vaccination with a single dose of human aCD27 antibody (Varlilumab), we found there is a robust increase in the HER2 specific T cells compared to vaccination alone, especially CD27+CD44+ memory CD4 T cells, even after 120 days post vaccination. Using an ICIinsensitive syngeneic HER2+ BC models, we found 50% of mice in the combination group of aCD27 antibody plus Ad-HER2 showed total tumor regression by the end of study. When combined with anti-PD1 antibody, the combination of AdHER2 and Varlilumab leads to total tumor regression in 90% of tumor bearing mice with syngeneic HER2+ BC, indicating that the vaccination against tumor associated antigen HER2 plus anti-CD27 antibody sensitized ICI-insensitive HER2+ BC toward ICI. Conclusion(s): Our data demonstrates that the administration of anti-CD27 antibody significantly increase the long term presence of CD27+ antigen specific memory T cells after vaccination against tumor associated antigen HER2. As consequence, combination of anti-CD27 with HER2 sensitized the immune unresponsive breast cancer toward anti-PD1 antibody. Our study suggests that the vaccination against tumor-associated antigen with mAb targeting CD27 leads to the robust cellular immunity, which is required for successful ICIs against breast cancer.
RESUMO
Objective: During the COVID-19 pandemic, cancer patients had restricted access to standard of care tissue biopsy. Liquid biopsy assays using next generation sequencing technology provides a less invasive method for determining circulating tumour mutations (ctDNA) associated with targeted treatments or prognosis. As part of deploying technology to help cancer patients obtain molecular testing, a clinical program was initiated to offer liquid biopsy testing for Canadian patients with advanced or metastatic breast cancer. Method(s): Blood was drawn in two 10 mL StreckTM DNA BCTs and sent to the CAP/CLIA/DAP accredited Imagia Canexia Health laboratory for testing using the clinically validated Follow ItTM liquid biopsy assay. Plasma was isolated using a double spin protocol and plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) extracted using an optimized Promega Maxwell RSC method. Extracted cfDNA was amplified using the multiplex amplicon-based hotspot 30 or 38 gene panel and sequenced. An inhouse developed bioinformatics pipeline and reporting platform were used to identify pathogenic single nucleotide variants (SNVs), indels (insertions and deletions), and gene amplification. Included in the panel are genes associated with metastatic breast cancer: AKT1, BRAF, ERBB2, ESR1, KRAS, PIK3CA, TP53. Result(s): To identify biomarkers, 1214 metastatic or advanced breast cancer patient cfDNA samples were tested. There were 15 cases sent for repeat testing. We reported 48% of samples harboring pathogenic ctDNA mutations in TP53 (22%), PIK3CA (19%), ESR1 (18%), AKT1 (2%), ERBB2 (1.5%). Co-occurring variants were identified in samples with ESR1/PIK3CA as well as TP53/PIK3CA (both p-values <0.001). Interestingly, 29% of samples with mutated ESR1 harbored >= 2 ESR1 ctDNA mutations. In 56% of cases, previous molecular testing indicated the cancer subtype as hormone receptor (ER, PR) positive with/without HER2 negative status. In this specific subgroup, 49% harbored ctDNA mutations with 63% of those being PIK3CA and/or ESR1 mutations. Conclusion(s): A population of Canadian women with metastatic breast cancer were tested using a liquid biopsy gene panel during the COVID-19 pandemic for identification of biomarkers for targeted therapeutic options. Over 50% of the samples were identified as hormone positive, with greater than 60% harboring PIK3CA and ESR1 ctDNA mutations. Studies have shown that metastatic PIK3CA mutated ER-positive/HER2-negative tumors are predictive to respond to alpelisib therapy and have FDA and Health Canada approval. Additionally, ESR1 mutations are associated with acquired resistance to antiestrogen therapies, and interestingly we identified 29% of ESR1 mutated samples with multiple mutations possibly indicating resistance subclones. In future studies, longitudinal monitoring for presence of multiple targetable and resistance mutations could be utilized to predict or improve clinical management.
RESUMO
Background: Breats cancer is a major health problem in elderly ( >= 70 years) women. Increase incidence with age and the progressive increase in life expectancy mean that the numbers in elderly breast cancer diagnosis are increasing. These patients do not always receive the proper treatment and despite this the survival of this population is not always depends on cancer, there are other competing causes of death typical of the aging population. Method(s): A retrospective observational analysis of women >= age 70 diagnosed with breast carcinoma in HUPHM between 2014 and 2020 was made. Clinical, pathological data and stages at diagnosis were analyzed. We checked our patients with the national death center (official national registry) thus obtaining an exact date of death and the cause of death. Data updated in January 2023 , ensuring a minimum follow-up of 24 months. We excluded deaths from Covid or of unknown cause to avoid bias. Result(s): A total of 421 patients were analyzed, mean age of 78.6 years and median follow-up of 48 months. 28% of patients had died at the time of analysis, 11% due to cancer and 17% from other causes. If we analyze the population deceased by cancer, no deaths are detected in patients diagnosed with carcinoma in situ (4% of the population), in stage I (30% of the population) the cumulative incidence of cancer death at 5 years is 3%, 7% In stage II (30% of the population), 15% in stage III (16%) and 70% in stage IV (12%). Death by other causes are more frequent in early breast cancer, the cumulative incidence at 5 years are 10% in stage I, 22% in stage II, 44% in satge III and just 10% in stage IV. The most frequent causes of death in this population were caridovascular events and infections. There are no differences in 5-year mortality according to histological subtypes 20%, 12%, 25% and 12% for triple negative, Rh+/HER2-, RH+/her2+ and RH-/HER2+ respectively. Conclusion(s): Although elderly patients do not receive optical treatments, mortality from cancer in early stages is incidental at 5 years, a different scenario is seen in metastatic disease in which the patient's prognosis depends mainly on the oncological disease, Therefore, an effort should be made in the treatment of these patients with metastatic breast cancer since adequate treatments can have a clearly positive impact on the survival of patients. Legal entity responsible for the study: The authors. Funding(s): Has not received any funding. Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.Copyright © 2023
RESUMO
Background: The phase III EMERALD trial (NCT03778931) reported significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and a manageable safety profile with elacestrant vs SoC endocrine therapy (ET) in patients (N=478) with ER+/HER2- advanced or mBC following progression on prior CDK4/6i plus ET. PROs measuring quality of life (QoL) are reported here. Method(s): EMERALD patients (pts) completed 3 PRO tools at prespecified time points: the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30), the PRO version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE), and the EuroQoL 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L). Result(s): The ratio of PROs tools completed vs. PROs tools expected was 80-90% through cycle 4 and approximately 70% at cycle 6;likely due to clinical study period overlapping with COVID-19 period. Overall, the EORTC QLQ-C30 scores were similar for elacestrant and SoC, with no differences across all time points for both functional and symptom scales. However, PRO-CTCAE results showed that fewer pts who received elacestrant reported very severe nausea (4.0% vs 14.3% by cycle 6) or very severe vomiting (9.1% vs 50% by cycle 6) compared with SoC. There were no clinically meaningful differences across all time points in adverse events typically observed with pts with cancer on ET, such as fatigue, nausea, vomiting, joint and muscle pain and hot flashes. EQ-5D-5L scores were generally comparable throughout treatment for both study arms, with elacestrant showing numerically better outcomes vs SoC for mobility, self-care and usual activities. Similar trends were observed for the full intent-to-treat population and in pts with detectable estrogen receptor 1 mutations (ESR1m). Conclusion(s): This analysis confirmed that QoL was maintained between treatment groups in the EMERALD trial. Together with the previously described statistically significant prolonged PFS and manageable safety profile, these PRO results provide additional evidence that oral elacestrant is clinically meaningful in this patient population with limited therapeutic options. Clinical trial identification: NCT03778931. Editorial acknowledgement: Jeffrey Walter, IQVIA. Legal entity responsible for the study: Stemline Therapeutics/Menarini Group. Funding(s): Stemline Therapeutics/Menarini Group. Disclosure: J. Cortes: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Roche, Celgene, Cellestia, AstraZeneca, Seattle Genetics, Daiichi Sankyo, Erytech, Athenex, Polyphor, Lilly, MERCK SHARP& DOHME, GSK, LEUKO, Bioasis, Clovis oncology, Boehringer Ingelheim, Ellipses, Hibercell, BioInvent, Gemoab, Gilead, Menarini, Zymeworks, Reveal Genomics;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Roche, Novartis, Celgene, Eisai, Pfizer, Samsung Bioepis, Lilly, MERCK SHARP& DOHME, Daiichi Sankyo;Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting/advisor: Expres2ion Biotechnologies;Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: MedSIR, Nektar Therapeutics;Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Roche, Ariad Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Baxalta GMBH/Servier Affaires, Bayer healthcare, Eisai, Guardant Health, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, Piqur Therapeutics, Puma B, Queen Mary University of London;Other, Travel cost and expenses: Roche, Novartis, Eisai, Daiichi Sankyo, Pfizer, Gilead, AstraZeneca. F.C. Bidard: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Lilly, Novartis, Radius Health, Menarini;Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Role: Menarini;Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker's Bureau: Pfizer, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Roche, Lilly, Rain Therapeutics;Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Novartis, Pfizer, Menarini Silicon Biosystems, Prolynx;Financial Interests, Institutional, Other, patents: ESR1 & MSI detection techniques;Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Novartis. A. Bardia: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Pfizer, Novartis, Genentech, Merck, Sanofi, Eisa , Lilly, Mersana, AstraZeneca/Daiichi, Menarini, Gilead;Financial Interests, Personal, Royalties: UpToDate;Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: Genentech, Novartis, Pfizer, Merck, Sanofi, Radius Health, Immunomedics/Gilead, Daiichi Pharma/AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly.;Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator: Gilead, Mersana, AstraZeneca/Daiichi, Novartis, Pfizer, Genentech, Lilly, Merck, Sanofi. V.G. Kaklamani: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Honoraria: Genentech, Novartis, Pfizer, Genomic Health, Puma Biotechnology, AstraZeneca, Seattle Genetics, Daichi, Gilead Sciences;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Amgen, Eisai, Puma Biotechnology, Celldex, AstraZeneca, Athenex, bioTheranostics;Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker's Bureau: Genentech, Novartis, Genomic Health, Puma Biotechnology, Pfizer, AstraZeneca/Daiichi Sankyo;Financial Interests, Personal, Research Grant: Eisai. I. Vlachaki: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Menarini Hellas A.E. G. Tonini: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Menarini Ricerche S.p.A. N. Habboubi: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Stemline Therapeutics;Financial Interests, Personal, Leadership Role: Stemline Therapeutics. P.G. Aftimos: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Boehringer Ingelheim, Macrogenics, Roche, Novartis, Amcure, Servier, G1 Therapeutics, Radius, Deloitte, Menarini, Gilead, Novartis, Eisai, Lilly;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Synthon, Amgen;Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Roche.Copyright © 2023
RESUMO
Introduction: SARS-CoV-2 tropism for the ACE2 receptor, along with the multifaceted inflammatory reaction, is likely to drive the generalized hypercoagulable state seen in patients with COVID-19. Methodology: Using the original bioinformatic workflow and network medicine approaches we reanalyzed four coronavirus-related expression datasets and performed co-expression analysis focused on thrombosis and ACE2 related genes. We identified microRNAs (miRNAs) which play role in ACE2-related thrombosis in coronavirus infection and further, we validated the expressions of those miRNAs in 79 hospitalized COVID-19 patients and 32 healthy volunteers by PCR and monitored miRNAs patterns during the acute phase of COVID-19, as well as the prognostic potential of these miRNAs as biomarkers. Result(s): We identified EGFR, HSP90AA1, APP, TP53, PTEN, UBC, FN1, ELAVL1 and CALM1 as regulatory genes which could play a pivotal role in COVID-19 related thrombosis. We also found miR-16-5p, miR-27a-3p, Let- 7b-5p and miR-155-5p as regulators in coagulation and thrombosis process. We observed in separate cohort of COVID-19 patients and healthy controls that (i) expression of miR-16-5p, miR-27a-3p and miR-155-5p increased during observation, compared to the baseline measurement;(ii) a low baseline miR-16-5p expression presents predictive utility in assessment of the hospital length of stay or death in follow-up as a composite endpoint (AUC: 0.810, 95% CI, 0.71-0.91, p<0.0001);(iii) low baseline expression of miR-16-5p and diabetes mellitus are independent predictors of increased length of stay or death according to a multivariate analysis (OR: 9.417;95% CI, 2.647-33.506;p=0.0005 and OR: 6.257;95% CI, 1.049- 37.316;p=0.044, respectively). Conclusion(s): This study enabled us to better characterize changes in gene expression and signaling pathways related to COVID-19 thrombosis. In this study we identified, characterized and validated miRNAs which could serve as novel, thrombosis-related biomarkers of the COVID-19, can be used for early stratification of patients and prediction of severity of infection development in an individual. (Figure Presented) .
RESUMO
Background The phase III CheckMate 816 study demonstrated statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in event-free survival (EFS) and pathologic complete response (pCR) with neoadjuvant N + C vs C in patients (pts) with resectable NSCLC. Here, we report 3-y efficacy, safety, and exploratory biomarker analyses from CheckMate 816. Methods Adults with stage IB (tumors >=4 cm)-IIIA (per AJCC 7th ed) resectable NSCLC, ECOG PS <= 1, and no known EGFR/ALK alterations were randomized to N 360 mg + C Q3W or C alone Q3W for 3 cycles followed by surgery. Primary endpoints were EFS and pCR, both per blinded independent review. Exploratory analyses included EFS by surgical approach and extent/completeness of resection, and EFS and pCR by a 4-gene (CD8A, CD274, STAT-1, LAG-3) inflammatory signature score derived from RNA sequencing of baseline (BL) tumor samples. Results At a median follow-up of 41.4 mo (database lock, Oct 14, 2022), continued EFS benefit was observed with N + C vs C (HR, 0.68;95% CI, 0.49-0.93);3-y EFS rates were 57% and 43%, respectively. N + C improved EFS vs C in pts who had surgery, regardless of surgical approach or extent of resection, and in pts with R0 resection (table). Recurrence occurred in 28% and 42% of pts who had surgery in the N + C (n = 149) and C arms (n = 135), respectively. In the N + C arm, BL 4-gene inflammatory signature scores were numerically higher in pts with pCR vs pts without, and EFS was improved in pts with high vs low scores (data to be presented). Grade 3-4 treatment-related and surgery-related adverse events occurred in 36% and 11% of pts in the N + C arm, respectively, vs 38% and 15% in the C arm. Conclusions Neoadjuvant N + C continues to provide long-term clinical benefit vs C in pts with resectable NSCLC, regardless of surgical approach or extent of resection. Exploratory analyses in pts treated with N + C suggested that high BL tumor inflammation may be associated with improved EFS and pCR. Clinical trial identification NCT02998528. Editorial acknowledgement Medical writing and editorial support for the development of this , under the direction of the authors, was provided by Adel Chowdhury, PharmD, Samantha Dwyer, PhD, and Michele Salernitano of Ashfield MedComms, an Inizio company, and funded by Bristol Myers Squibb. Legal entity responsible for the study Bristol Myers Squibb. Funding Bristol Myers Squibb. Disclosure P.M. Forde: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, F-Star, G1 Therapeutics, Genentech, Iteos, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi, Surface;Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: AstraZeneca, BioNTech, Bristol Myers Squibb, Corvus, Kyowa, Novartis, Regeneron;Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Trial steering committee member: AstraZeneca, BioNTech, Bristol Myers Squibb, Corvus;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Member of the Board of Directors: Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role, Scientific advisory board member: LUNGevity Foundation. J. Spicer: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, CLS Therapeutics, Merck, Protalix Biotherapeutics, Roche;Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting fees: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Novartis, Protalix Biotherapeutics, Regeneron, Roche, Xenetic Biosciences;Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker's Bureau: AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, PeerView;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Data safety monitoring board member: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Leadership Role, Industry chair: Canadian Association of Thoracic Surgeons. [Formula presented] N. Girard: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: AstraZeneca, BMS, MSD, Roche, Pfizer, Mirati, Amgen, Novartis, Sanofi;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, BMS, MSD, Roche, Pfizer, Janssen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Sanofi, AbbVie, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Grunenthal, Tak da, Owkin;Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant, Local: Roche, Sivan, Janssen;Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: BMS;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Officer, International Thymic malignancy interest group, president: ITMIG;Other, Personal, Other, Family member is an employee: AstraZeneca. M. Provencio: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda;Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker's Bureau: AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda. S. Lu: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GenomiCare, Hutchison MediPharma, Roche, Simcere, ZaiLab;Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker's Bureau: AstraZeneca, Hanosh, Roche. M. Awad: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting fees: ArcherDX, Ariad, AstraZeneca, Blueprint Medicine, Bristol Myers Squibb, EMD Serono, Genentech, Maverick, Merck, Mirati, Nektar, NextCure, Novartis, Syndax;Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Genentech, Eli Lilly. T. Mitsudomi: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Boehringer Ingelheim, BridgeBio Pharma;Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting fees: AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai, MSD, Novartis, Ono, Pfizer;Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker's Bureau: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Guardant, Invitae, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Ono, Pfizer, Taiho;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Leadership Role, Former president: IASLC. E. Felip: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Fundacion Merck Salud, Merck KGAa;Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting fees: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BerGenBio, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Peptomyc, Pfizer, Sanofi, Takeda;Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker's Bureau: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Janssen, Medical Trends, Medscape, Merck, MSD, PeerVoice, Pfizer, Sanofi, Takeda, touchONCOLOGY;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Member of the Board of Directors: Grifols. S.J. Swanson: Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker's Bureau: Ethicon. F. Tanaka: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Ono, Taiho;Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting fees: AstraZeneca, Chugai, Ono;Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker's Bureau: AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai, Covidien, Eli Lilly, Intuitive, Johnson & Johnson, Kyowa Kirin, MSD, Olympus, Ono, Pfizer, Stryker, Taiho, Takeda. P. Tran: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Bristol Myers Squibb;Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Bristol Myers Squibb. N. Hu: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Bristol Myers Squibb. J. Cai: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Bristol Myers Squibb;Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Bristol Myers Squibb;Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel support for attending meetings and travel: Bristol Myers Squibb. J. Bushong: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Bristol Myers Squibb;Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Bristol Myers Squibb. J. Neely: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Bristol Myers Squibb;Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Bristol Myers Squibb. D. Balli: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, patents planned, issued, or pending: Bristol Myers Squibb;Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Bristol Myers Squibb. S.R. Broderick: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.Copyright © 2023 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by E sevier Inc.
RESUMO
Background The pandemic has accelerated the introduction of more flexible and cost-effective treatment forms. The efficacy of trastuzumab in the intravenous (IV) and SC forms is similar both in early and advanced HER2-positive breast cancer (BC) patients. Compared to IV administration, SC enables reduction of treatment costs and time, and saves equipment and human resources. SC formulation is more convenient for both patients and healthcare providers and may be implemented as a home-based therapy. Recently, systemic anticancer treatment (including chemotherapy) has been increasingly performed at home, improving patient comfort and reducing the burden on the healthcare system. Poland has already implemented home-based treatment with some biologic compounds;however, they have not included trastuzumab in BC patients. Objectives This RWE analysis aims to evaluate the organizational and therapeutic procedures related to the home-based treatment with SC trastuzumab and the attitudes of patients and healthcare providers to this approach. Material and methods The study enrolled early HER2(+) BC patients treated with trastuzumab during the COVID-19 pandemic. Monitoring and treatment duration were consistent with SmPC and reimbursement regulations in Poland. The first 3-6 doses of SC trastuzumab (alone or in combination with CHT) were administered at a cancer center in outpatient and inpatient settings. Subsequent doses were administered at home by 3 qualified breast nurses. Post-injection follow-up was used for educational purposes. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics. The study was reviewed and approved by the local Bioethics Committee. Results The analysis included 20 patients treated in two comprehensive cancer centers in Poland with a median age of 59 years (range, 36-72 years). Seven patients (35%) were professionally active. The average distance from the place of residence to the cancer center was 24 km (range, 2-65 km). A total of 232 doses were administered (mean 11.6 doses per patient;range 6-14), 133 doses at home and 99 at the cancer center. The overall tolerance of trastuzumab was good and consistent with the known safety profile described in Summary of Product Characteristics. Only 1 patient (5%) discontinued treatment prematurely due to decreased LVEF;another 19 patients completed treatment as planned. For 19 patients (95%), the benefits of SC treatment included time savings, the ability to continue working, and avoiding crowded places and infection risk. 2 patients (10%) considered the nurse's visit privacy disturbing, while 18 (90%) would recommend home-based drug administration. The average duration of a nurse's stay at home was 60 minutes (range 30 to 130 minutes). No logistical or technical problems were reported, except for occasional patient lateness. Nurses positively assessed the treatment provided in the nursing office, which was a source of additional knowledge, and experience. The overall impression of home-based therapy was positive for both patients and nurses. The limitation of the study is the declarative nature of the data. Conclusions Home-based treatment with SC trastuzumab should be pursued due to its safety, ease of organization, positive perception by patients and nurses, and reducing healthcare system resources. It can be particularly valuable for disabled patients who have difficulty reaching the hospital and professionally active patients. Specialized, trained nurses can self-sufficiently carry out part of the prolonged trastuzumab treatment, reducing physician involvement.
RESUMO
Background: Residual disease (RD) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in early HER2- negative breast cancer (BC) remains an unmet medical need. However, no therapies to date have tested their activity directly in chemo-resistant RD. Here, we hypothesized that combining an oncolytic virus such as T-VEC with atezolizumab may offer clinical benefit in patients (pts) with RD after standard NAC. To our knowledge, PROMETEO is the first trial that examines the activity of immunotherapy in pts with RD prior to surgery. Method(s): PROMETEO (NCT03802604) is a singlearm, open-label, multicenter phase II trial. Women with triple-negative BC (TNBC) or hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) BC with baseline (i.e., before NAC) ki67 >= 20% were eligible. RD was confirmed with a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showing a tumor diameter >= 10 mm and a core-biopsy detecting the presence of invasive cells. Before surgery, T-VEC was administered intratumorally on week 1 (106 pfu/mL), then in week 4 and every 2 weeks thereafter (108 pfu/mL) for 4 injections. Atezolizumab (840 mg) was administered intravenously every 2 weeks for 4 infusions, starting at week 4. Surgery was performed in < 3 weeks after completing the treatment. The primary objective was to evaluate the efficacy of the combination, measured by the rate of residual cancer burden (RCB) class 0/1 at surgery. Tumor samples collected at 5 timepoints (before NAC, during screening period, after first dose of T-VEC, after first dose of T-VEC and atezolizumab and at surgery) were mandatory to assess gene expression, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), immune cells PD-L1 IHC (SP142), tumor mutational burden (TMB) by FoundationOne and other translational endpoints. Result(s): Between Dec 2018 to Feb 2022, 28 pts were enrolled: 20 pts with HR+/HER2- disease and 8 pts with TNBC. Median age was 47 (range 31-71) and 71% of pts were premenopausal. At diagnosis before NAC, clinical stage II disease represented 60.7%, cN+ 60.7%, median Ki-67 was 37.5% (range 20%-95%), high TILs (>=10%) 37%, median TMB was 3 (0-19) and only 1 of 27 pts (3.7%) had a PD-L1-positive tumor. After NAC, mean tumor size by MRI was 28.3 mm (10-93). Two pts discontinued from the trial (1 withdrawal of consent and 1 COVID infection). The completion of 5 cycles of treatment was achieved by 73% of pts. The overall RCB-0/1 rate was 25% (7 of 28, 95% IC 10.7 - 44.9%), all with RCB 0 (pathologic complete response [pCR]). The pCR rate was 30% in HR+/HER2- disease and 12.5 % in TNBC. Radiological response by MRI was achieved by 3 of 28 pts (10.7%). Interestingly, none of the 7 pts with a pCR had radiological response (stable disease n=5, progressive disease [PD] n=2). Six pts (21.4%) had radiological PD and had RCB 2/3. Overall, 27 (96%) patients had at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) of any grade. Most common grade 1 or 2 AEs were fever (11 pts, 39.3%), ALT increased (9 pts, 32.1%), AST increased (8 pts, 28.6%), arthralgia (6 pts, 21.4%) and anemia (6 pts, 21.4%). Grade 3 reversible neutropenia occurred in 1 patient. Across all pts, significant increases (p< 0.001) in TILs, immune genes and immune PDL1+ cells were observed after 1 dose of TVEC, 1 dose of the combination and at surgery. Intrinsic subtype changes at surgery occurred in 73.1% of cases, mostly (46.1%) Luminal A/B converting to Normal-like. At surgery, 19 of 26 (73.1%) of tumors were PDL1+. Conclusion(s): Two months of T-VEC in combination with atezolizumab induced a pCR in a subgroup of pts with chemoresistant HER2- breast cancer. This effect is probably related to the immune activation provoked by the combined treatment. Interestingly, a high discrepancy was observed between the presurgical radiological imaging and the actual surgical pathological report. Pre-operative window-ofopportunity trials in this context might provide important clues regarding the activity of novel treatment strategies.
RESUMO
Background: Datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) consisting of a humanized anti-TROP2 IgG1 monoclonal antibody covalently linked to a highly potent topoisomerase I (Topo I) inhibitor payload via a stable, tumor-selective, tetrapeptide-based cleavable linker. Dato-DXd demonstrated compelling single-agent antitumor activity in heavily pretreated patients (pts) with metastatic triple-negative BC (Krop, SABCS 2021). This is the first report of results from the TROPION-PanTumor01 study in pts with unresectable or metastatic hormone receptor- positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-;including HER2-low and HER2-zero) BC. Method(s): TROPION-PanTumor01 (NCT03401385) is a phase 1, multicenter, open-label, 2-part doseescalation/expansion study evaluating Dato-DXd in previously treated pts with solid tumors. Based on previous clinical findings and exposure-response results from pts with NSCLC, Dato-DXd 6 mg/kg IV Q3W is being evaluated in pts with unresectable or metastatic HR+/HER2- BC that progressed on standard therapies. The primary objectives were safety and tolerability. Tumor responses, including ORR (complete response [CR] + partial response [PR]) and DCR (CR + PR + stable disease [SD]), were assessed per RECIST version 1.1 by blinded independent central review. Result(s): As of the April 29, 2022, data cutoff, 41 pts had received Dato-DXd (median follow-up, 10.9 mo [range, 7-13]);9 pts were ongoing. The primary cause of treatment discontinuation was disease progression (63% progressive disease [PD] or clinical progression). Median age was 57 y (range, 33- 75);54% had de novo metastatic disease. Pts were heavily pretreated (Table) with a median of 5 (range, 3-10) prior regimens in the advanced setting;95% had prior CDK4/6i (adjuvant/metastatic). Median time from initial treatment for metastatic disease to the first dose of Dato-DXd was 42.7 mo (range, 10.2-131.1). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs;all cause) were observed in 98% (any grade) and 41% (grade >=3) of pts. Most common TEAEs (any grade, grade >=3) were stomatitis (80%, 10%), nausea (56%, 0%), fatigue (46%, 2%), and alopecia (37%, 0%). Serious TEAEs were observed in 6 pts (15%);1 pt died due to dyspnea, which was not considered to be treatment related. Dose reductions occurred in 5 pts due to stomatitis (n=3), fatigue (n=2), keratitis (n=1), and decreased appetite (n=1) (>1 AE per pt);14 pts had treatment delayed due to stomatitis (n=8), retinopathy (n=1), dysphagia (n=1), fatigue (n=1), malaise (n=1), COVID-19 (n=1), cellulitis (n=1), urinary tract infection (n=1), decreased lymphocyte count (n=1), and nasal congestion (n=1;>1 AE per pt). Three pts discontinued treatment due to keratitis (n=1) and pneumonitis (n=2);1 case of pneumonitis was adjudicated as grade 2 drug-related interstitial lung disease. The ORR was 29% (11 confirmed PRs;1 pending confirmation), the DCR was 85% (35/41), and the clinical benefit rate (CR + PR + SD >=6 mo) was 41% (17/41). Conclusion(s): Dato-DXd demonstrated a manageable safety profile and encouraging antitumor activity, with high disease control in heavily pretreated pts, the majority having received prior CDK4/6i. Based on these findings, the TROPION-Breast01 (NCT05104866) randomized phase 3 study comparing 2L+ Dato-DXd vs investigator's choice chemotherapy is currently enrolling pts with HR+/HER2- BC.
RESUMO
Background: Mammographic screening programmes reduce breast cancer mortality, but detect many small tumours with favourable biological features which may not progress during a woman's lifetime. Screen-detected cancers are treated with standard surgery and adjuvant therapies, with associated morbidities. There is a need to reduce overtreatment of good prognosis tumours and numerous studies have evaluated the omission of radiotherapy in this context. However, there is little evidence to support surgical de-escalation, although percutaneous minimally invasive treatment approaches have been described. Vacuum-assisted excision (VAE) is in widespread use for management of benign lesions and lesions of uncertain malignant potential. SMALL (ISRCTN 12240119) is designed to determine the feasibility of using this approach for treatment of small invasive tumours detected within the UK NHS Breast Screening Programme (BSP). Method(s): SMALL is a phase III multicentre randomised trial comparing standard surgery with VAE for screendetected good prognosis cancers. The main eligibility criteria are age >=47 years, unifocal grade 1 tumours with maximum diameter 15mm, which are strongly ER/PR+ve and HER2-ve, with negative clinical/radiological axillary staging. Patients are randomised 2:1 in favour of VAE or surgery;with no axillary surgery in the VAE arm. Completeness of excision is assessed radiologically, and if excision is incomplete, patients undergo open surgery. Adjuvant radiotherapy and endocrine therapy are mandated in the VAE arm but may be omitted following surgery. Co-primary end-points are: 1. Noninferiority comparison of the requirement for a second procedure following excision 2. Single arm analysis of local recurrence (LR) at 5 years following VAE Recruitment of 800 patients will permit demonstration of 10% non-inferiority of VAE for requirement of a second procedure. This ensures sufficient patients for single arm analysis of LR rates, where expected LR free survival is 99% at 5 years, with an undesirable survival probability after VAE of 97%. To ensure that the trial as a whole only has 5% alpha, the significance level for each co-primary outcome is set at 2.5% with 90% power. The Data Monitoring Committee will monitor LR events to ensure these do not exceed 3% per year. Secondary outcome measures include time to ipsilateral recurrence, overall survival, complications, quality of life and health economic analysis. A novel feature of SMALL is the integration of a QuinteT Recruitment Intervention (QRI), which aims to optimise recruitment to the study. Recruitment challenges are identified by analysing recruiter/patient interviews and audiorecordings of trial discussions, and by review of trial screening logs, eligibility and recruitment data and study documentation. Solutions to address these are developed collaboratively, including individual/group recruiter feedback and recruitment tips documents. Result(s): SMALL opened in December 2019, but recruitment halted in 2020 for 5 months due to COVID-19. At 7st July 2022, 142 patients had been randomised from 26 centres, with a randomisation rate of approximately 45%, and a per site recruitment rate of 0.4-0.5 patients/month, approaching the feasibility recruitment target of 144 patients. Drawing from preliminary QRI findings and insights from patient representatives, a recruitment tips document has been circulated (on providing balanced information about treatments, encouraging recruiters to engage with patient preferences, and explaining randomisation). Individual recruiter feedback has commenced, with wider feedback delivered across sites via recruitment training workshops. Conclusion(s): Despite pandemic-related challenges, SMALL has an excellent recruitment rate to date and is expected to have a global impact on treatment of breast cancer within mammographic screening programmes.
RESUMO
Introduction: COVID-19 pandemic represents a major health issue caused by SARS CoV2, a human coronavirus. Since the outbreak of this pandemic, the literature on SARS CoV-2 has grown differentially, with increased awareness of extra-respiratory symptoms, including neurological symptoms. Method(s): Review based on studies published from December 2019 to June 2020. Results and Discussion: This review discusses the neurological aspect of SARS CoV2, including the suggested mechanism involved. Neurological disorders are cited in addition to emerging experimental models with viral involvement. Conclusion(s): There is a need for further investigation to clarify how it can lead to the onset of acute and chronic neurological disorders, mentioning the importance of experimental studies in neuropsy-chopharmacology.Copyright © 2022 Bentham Science Publishers.
RESUMO
Introduction: We performed matched case-control studies utilizing cohorts of postmenopausal women with ER+ breast cancer receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitors (AI) on MA.27 [anastrozole, exemestane] or PreFace [letrozole] to assess the association between estrogen suppression after 6 months of treatment and an early breast cancer (EBC) event within 5 years of AI initiation (Clin Cancer Res 2020;26:2986-98). We found a significant 3.0-fold increase in risk of an EBC event for those taking anastrozole with levels of estrone (E1) >=1.3 pg/mL and estradiol (E2) >=0.5 pg/mL, but not for exemestane or letrozole. Given these findings we designed a prospective pharmacodynamic (PD) study to evaluate the impact of anastrozole (1 mg/day: ANA1) on E1 and E2 levels, and among those with inadequate estrogen suppression (IES: E1 >=1.3 pg/mL and E2 >=0.5 pg/mL), to evaluate the safety and PD efficacy of high-dose anastrozole (10 mg/day: ANA10), which has been found to be safe in prior clinical trials (Cancer 1998;83:1142-52). Method(s): Post-menopausal women with stage I-III, ER >=1% positive/HER2-negative breast cancer who were candidates for anastrozole were eligible after completion of locoregional therapy and chemotherapy, as clinically indicated. Women who were pre-menopausal at diagnosis were not eligible. All patients received 8-10 weeks of ANA1, after which those with adequate estrogen suppression (AES: E1< 1.3 pg/mL or E2< 0.5 pg/mL) came off study. Those with IES went on to receive ANA10 for 8-10 weeks, followed by letrozole (2.5 mg/day: LET) for 8-10 weeks. All patients were managed at their treating oncologist's discretion following study discontinuation. E1 and E2 blood levels were measured pre-treatment and after completion of each treatment cycle by a CLIA-approved liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry in the Immunochemical Core Laboratory at Mayo Clinic. With a sample size of 29 patients with IES after ANA1, a one-sided binomial test of proportions with a significance level of 0.05 will have an 87% chance of rejecting the proportion with AES after ANA10 is at most 25% (Ho) when the true proportion is at least 50%. Specifically, the null hypothesis is rejected if the number of women with AES after ANA10 is 12 or more. Data lock was July 6, 2022. Result(s): Of the 161 women enrolled from April 2020 through May 2022, 3 withdrew consent prior to start of ANA1 and 2 were ineligible;thus, 156 women comprised the study cohort. Median patient age was 64 years (range 44-86), 10% of patients were of Hispanic ethnicity and/or non-white race, and 15% received chemotherapy. Six patients remain on ANA1, and 10 discontinued ANA1 due to refusal (7), adverse event (AE) (2), or COVID-19 (1). Forty-one of the remaining 140 patients (29.3% 95%CI: 21.9- 37.6%) had IES with ANA1. Nine of these 41 patients did not go on to ANA10 due to refusal (6) or AE (3). Of the 32 patients who started ANA10, 8 remain on treatment, 5 discontinued due to refusal (3) or AE (1-grade 2 urinary tract infection;1-grade 1 palpitations), and 19 had a blood draw 45 days or more after starting ANA10. No grade 3-5 AEs or grade 2 hot flashes or arthralgias were reported. Of these 19 patients, 14 achieved AES with ANA10 (73.7% 95%CI: 48.8-90.9%). All 19 patients switched to LET of which 3 remain on treatment, 1 is missing E1/E2 data, and 15 had a blood draw 45 days or more after starting LET. Of these 15 patients, 10 maintained AES, 2 acquired AES with LET, and 3 no longer had AES. Anastrozole and letrozole drug levels will be reported at the meeting. Conclusion(s): Approximately 29% of postmenopausal women with ER+/HER2- BC receiving adjuvant anastrozole 1 mg/daily had IES. A majority of these patients achieved AES with dose escalation to ANA10 without tolerability issues. E1 and E2 levels are logical biomarkers given the mechanism of action of anastrozole, and further study utilizing them to determine the optimal dose of anastrozole for a given patient should be performed.
RESUMO
Introduction: More than 2 years after the WHO declaration of a pandemic, SARS-Cov-2 still represents a public health problem The pandemic has increased the complexity of cancer treatments including breast cancer. These difficulties were highlighted in adjuvant treatments but above all in metastatic disease. Vaccination has been one of the most important public health factors that has reduced deaths, hospitalizations and the severity of symptoms related to infection. In metastatic breast cancer hormone receptor positive and HER2/neu negative currently the first line of treatment is given by the association between cyclin 4/6 inhibitors and hormone therapy (aromatase inhibitors or fulvestrant) A well-known and frequent side effect of this therapy is the reduction of white blood cell values and neutrophils. The hypothesis that this study is to evaluate whether treatment with cyclin inhibitors initiated before the period of vaccinations may have influenced, due to the reduction in white blood cell values, an increased risk of infection in these patients. Material(s) and Method(s): In our study, we selected patients who had started treatment with cyclin inhibitors before starting the vaccination cycle (in Italy up to the fourth dose in cancer patients) and continue it without evidence of disease progression. All patients were offered a vaccination cycle with mRNA COVID vaccines and were followed during their cancer treatments. All patients, at least 90 days after the last dose of vaccine, have been tested for antibodies against SARS CoV-2 (trimeric spike protein) with a value expressed in binding antibodies unit (BAU) according to international standard WHO During the observation period (starting from the first dose of vaccine administered) the patients were clinically checked and in case of suspicion of infectious pathology with symptoms suggestive of SARS-COV-19 infection, they were tested with molecular swab Results: We evaluated 52 patients who started cyclin treatment before the vaccination course and who are currently without signs of disease recurrence During the study period we found 14 SARSCOV19 infections (28% of patients) and one patient with two infectious episodes. No patients needed treatment in a hospital or resuscitation setting. All patients have fully recovered from the infection and at most after 21 days have resumed the treatment still in place Statistically, a linear regression calculation was applied to evaluate a functional relationship between variables measured on the basis of sample data. We did not find a relationship between spikes or infections compared to the start date of the vaccination cycle;instead we observed a relationship between the value of the spike and the date of last immunization (considered as an active infection or fourth dose of vaccine) with a reduction in the values the further you go away Conclusion(s): The data of the study show that there is a correlation between the time elapsed between the last vaccination and the risk of getting sick. For this reason, the fourth recall represents a strong help to reduce this risk. We did not find any ranges we could refer to regarding the dosage of trimeric spike protein. Considering the positivity rate of infections that does not exceed the general vaccinated population and the absence of serious infectious symptoms with hospitalization, treatment with cyclin inhibitors appears to be a safe treatment even in a pandemic period. (Table Presented).
RESUMO
Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, Twitter has been instrumental in accelerating knowledge dissemination and forging collaborations within the medical community and amongst patient advocates. Tweetchats within Twitter are scheduled conversations on a specific topic. In oncology, Tweetchats have been used by cancer advocates to spread awareness and for patient and caregiver education. A colorectal cancer (CRC) specific tweetchat did not previously exist. This describes the creation, and experiences with a CRC specific tweetchat. Method(s): The #CRCTrialsChat tweetchat was created by a patient advocate for colorectal cancer patients, caregivers and clinicians to meet and exchange clinical trial-related information. Two gastrointestinal (GI) medical oncologists and two radiation oncologists were enlisted as moderators. The topic for each session is chosen by the patient advocate, who creates an outline and divides the content, which is designed to last a one hour session. The idea is to create engaging, technical, but easy to understand content. Each moderator then works on the answers to their assigned section, which is edited to fit tweet character limit. Sessions may also have guest moderators with expertise on a specific topic. Through tweeting, moderators answer specific questions that come up during the session and later. Result(s): To date, we have had four sessions covering the following topics: Clinical trial basics, CRC Updates from ASCO22, ClinicalTrialFinders and BRAF-mutated tumors. The content created has been simple and engaging, the format has functioned smoothly, and the reach of #CRCTrialsChat has been steadily increasing. After the most recent session on BRAF in September 2022, the @CRCTrialsChat has 281 followers, 17K impressions and 14.6K profile visits, a reflection of its excellent content. From a clinician perspective, this is a great format to interact with colleagues, discuss enrolling trials and also become familiar with using Twitter. Conclusion(s): A CRC clinical trial focused tweetchat is an engaging way to deliver trial-related content to an audience of clinicians, patients and caregivers. The current format appears to be an effective way to create and disseminate information. Future sessions will focus on ctDNA, molecular markers such as KRAS and HER2, and rectal cancer trials. Our hope is that #CRCTrialsChat will stimulate continued patient and clinician engagement, increase awareness of clinical trials, enhance trial participation and initiate patient-centric research and collaborations.
RESUMO
Background: HER2+ mBC remains incurable, with a need for new HER2-directed therapies and regimens, including chemotherapy-free options. Zanidatamab (zani) is a novel HER2-targeted bispecific antibody that binds HER2 in a unique trans configuration, driving multiple mechanisms of antitumor activity, including complement-dependent cytotoxicity. A CDK4/6 inhibitor combined with endocrine therapy is an approved treatment for HER2-negative/HR+ mBC and this combination has also demonstrated encouraging antitumor activity when paired with HER2-targeted therapy(ies) in HER2+/HR+ mBC. Here, we report results from ZWI-ZW25-202 (NCT04224272), an ongoing singlearm phase 2 study of zani combined with palbociclib (palbo) and fulvestrant (fulv) in pts with HER2+/HR+ mBC. Method(s): Eligibility requirements include: HER2+/HR+ unresectable, locally advanced BC or mBC;ECOG PS of 0 or 1;prior treatment with trastuzumab, pertuzumab and T DM1 (additional prior HER2-targeting agents are permitted);and no prior treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitors. Part 1 of the study evaluated the safety and tolerability of the zani/palbo/fulv combination and determined the recommended doses for use in Part 2, where the antitumor activity of the combination is being evaluated. Endpoints include safety outcomes, progression-free survival at 6 months (PFS6), confirmed objective response rate (cORR) per RECIST v1.1;disease control rate (DCR=complete response [CR] plus partial response [PR] plus stable disease [SD]);duration of response (DOR);PFS;and overall survival. Result(s): As of 24 Feb 2022, 34 pts (33 HER2+/HR+ per central analysis) with a median age of 52 (range 36-77) have been treated. In the metastatic setting, pts had received a median (range) of 4 (1-10) prior systemic regimens, including 3 (1-8) different prior HER2 targeted therapies, and 1 (0-4) endocrine therapy. Seven pts (20%) had prior T DXd treatment and 7 pts had prior fulv treatment. All pts received zani (20 mg/kg Q2W) and standard doses of palbo and fulv. Eighteen pts (53%) remained on treatment;median duration of zani treatment was 6.9 mo (range 0.5- 16.3). A dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of neutropenia occurred in 1 of 7 DLT-evaluable pts in Part 1. Among all pts (n=34), the most common (>20%) treatment (zani, palbo and/or fulv)-related adverse events (TRAEs) were diarrhea (74%), neutrophil count decreased/neutropenia (62%), stomatitis (41%), asthenia (26%), nausea (24%), and anemia (21%). Grade (Gr) >=3 TRAEs in 2 or more pts included neutrophil count decreased/neutropenia (50%), anemia (6%), diarrhea (6%), and thrombocytopenia (6%). AEs of special interest were all Gr <=2 and included 4 pts with cardiac events (LVEF decrease of >=10% from baseline) and 1 pt with infusion-related reaction. There were no treatment-related serious AEs. Palbo was discontinued for 1 pt due to an AE (AST increase);no pt discontinued zani treatment as a result of AEs. Two deaths occurred: 1 due to disease progression and 1 due to an unrelated AE of pneumonia caused by COVID-19. In 29 pts with measurable disease, the cORR was 34.5% (95% CI: 17.9, 54.3), all responses were cPRs, of which 1 is pending CR confirmation. DOR ranged from 2.3 to 14.9+ mo, with 8 confirmed responses ongoing, and the DCR was 93.1% (95% CI: 77.2, 99.2). Interim median PFS was 11.3 mo (range 0.03-16.7;95% CI: 5.6, not estimable). PFS6 analysis is planned following the completion of enrollment. Conclusion(s): Zani in combination with palbo and fulv shows encouraging antitumor activity with durable responses in heavily pretreated pts and a manageable safety profile. This regimen has the potential to be a chemotherapy-free treatment option in pts with HER2+/HR+ mBC. Enrollment in the study is continuing.
RESUMO
Background: Approximately 30% to 50% of breast cancer patients experienced mental distress prior to the advent of COVID.The delayed access to cancer treatment due to the outbreak of COVID -19 pandemic posed a unique challenge to breast cancer patients and caused a significant level of mental distress among them. In the current research, we examined the psychological impacts of COVID on breast cancer patients in China using Symptom Checklist-90-R (SCL-90-R). Method(s): Participants were breast cancer patients at the outpatient clinic of Xijing hospital. The study was conducted virtually, and the questionnaires were distributed via Wenjuanxing, the Chinese alternative of Qualtrics. The researchers were healthcare workers affiliated with Xijing hospital, and the survey was sent to a breast cancer patient support group which included 1399 cancer patients and 6 healthcare workers. The initial sample consisted of 199 participants who signed an informed consent form to participate in the study. The inclusion criteria were as follows: 1) diagnosed with breast cancer, 2) aged 18 years or above, and 3) had no history of cognitive impairment or previous diagnosis of psychiatric disorders. The validated Mandarin version of the SCL-90-R (Wang, 1984) was then given to the participants to evaluate their psychological status.Categorical variables were summarized as numbers and percentages;continuous variables were described as mean (M) +/- standard deviation (SD). Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics Version 26. Result(s): Participants (N = 195) filled out the SCL-90 questionnaire in February, 2020. All participants were female breast cancer patients treated at Xijing hospital, among which 16.41%, 36.41%, 19.49%, and 28.21% had respectively received treatment for less than a year, 1-3 years, 3-5 years, and 5 years or more. 64.62% of the patients were at stage I;0.77% were at stage II and III;4.62% were at stage IV according to TNM classification. The molecular type of participants is as follows: 47.2% of ER+ HER2-, 31.8% of HER2+, and 21.0% of Triple negative.Participants whose treatments continued to be delayed, on average, reported an elevated general psychopathology score (M = 1.48, SD = 0.47) compared to participants whose treatments were resumed (M = 1.30, SD = 0.34), and the difference was statistically significant, t(193) = 2.96, p = .003, d = 0.44, 95%Cl [0.06, 0.30]. The one-way ANOVA revealed a marginally significant effect of length of treatment delay on general psychopathology score, F(4, 190) = 2.09, p = .08, eta2 = .04. Follow-up multiple comparison analysis showed that participants who had their treatment delayed for 3 weeks to 1 month (M = 1.70, SD = 0.70) reported significantly higher general psychopathology scores than participants whose delay in treatment was less than 1 week (M = 1.34, SD = 0.40), p = .05. General health status (p < .001) and current treatment status (p = .02) are the only two variables that were statistically associated with general psychopathology score.Poorer perceived health status and current delay in treatment were associated with higher general psychopathology score, Additionally, younger age was associated with higher interpersonal sensitivity (p = .01) and hostility (p = .006). Conclusion(s): We found that breast cancer patients at an advanced stage were more likely to experience psychological symptoms with longer treatment delay, and whose treatments continued to be delayed reported elevated psychological symptoms than individuals whose treatment were resumed, regardless of treatment type. Additionally, a treatment delay of more than three weeks might have exacerbated breast cancer patients' psychological symptoms, whereas a short-term delay of less than three weeks was less likely to have a significant effect on one's mental wellbeing.